# guide-comparatif-formats-conference-narrations-deep-research-2026-02

## Veille

Treatise on narrative architectures and conference formats - Global guide

## Titre Article

Traité d'Architecture Narrative et de Rhétorique de Conférence : Guide Global des Formats et des Structures de Communication

## Date

2026-02

## URL

https://github.com/dgirard/fiches-veille/blob/main/docs/deep%20research/202602/Guide%20Comparatif%20Formats%20Conf%C3%A9rence%20%26%20Narrations.md

## Keywords

Conference formats, keynote, TED Talk, Lightning Talk, Pecha Kucha, Ignite, pitch, storytelling, Sparkline, Golden Circle, Kishōtenketsu, Nancy Duarte, Garr Reynolds, Simon Sinek, StoryBrand, AIDA, PAS, cross-cultural rhetoric

## Authors

Deep Research Veille Interne

## Ton

**Profile**: Comprehensive academic treatise, analytical and prescriptive register, high technical level

**Description**: In-depth research document structured as an academic treatise, combining a rigorous taxonomy of public speaking formats, an analysis of design philosophies (Presentation Zen, Slidology), and a cross-cultural exploration of narrative structures. The tone is that of a strategic communication expert addressing professionals seeking to master the engineering of attention. Extensively sourced with 50 academic and professional references.

## Pense-betes

- **Three critical format variables**: Duration, degree of structural constraint, psychological contract with the audience
- **Visionary formats**:
- **Keynote** (45-60 min): Vision, leadership, strategic framing. Recommended framework: Sparkline
- **TED Talk** (12-18 min): One core idea, Logos/Pathos balance. Framework: Golden Circle
- **Ultra-short formats**:
- **Lightning Talk** (5-10 min): Immediate value, zero redundancy. Framework: AIDA
- **Pecha Kucha** (6m40, 20x20s): Visual storytelling, metaphorical images. Framework: Kishōtenketsu
- **Ignite** (5 min, 20x15s): Energy, extreme synthesis. Framework: Jo-ha-kyū
- **Pitch** (3-10 min): Sequoia structure (10 slides), PAS framework (Problem-Agitate-Solve)
- **Presentation Zen philosophy (Garr Reynolds)**: Simplicity, analog planning, concept of Ma (empty space)
- **Slidology (Nancy Duarte)**: Audience = hero, speaker = guide, slide understood in <6 seconds
- **Sparkline**: Oscillation "What is" ↔ "What could be" until the "new bliss"
- **Cross-cultural structures**:
- **Kishōtenketsu** (Asia): 4 parts, twist without conflict, reconciliation
- **Jo-ha-kyū** (Japan): Progressive acceleration of tempo
- **Circular narratives** (Indigenous): Return to the starting point with greater understanding
- **Dilemma Tale** (Africa): Open-ended final question, community debate
- **Curse of knowledge**: The speaker cannot imagine their audience's ignorance

## RésuméDe400mots

This comprehensive treatise analyzes the public speaking ecosystem through a taxonomy of formats, design methodologies, and cross-cultural narrative structures, culminating in a strategic recommendation matrix.

**Format mapping**: Formats are distinguished by three variables: duration, structural constraint, and psychological contract. The Keynote (45-60 min) occupies the summit of the rhetorical hierarchy, aiming to frame a vision and create emotional engagement. The TED Talk (18 min max) imposes a "single idea" as its pivot. Lightning Talks (5-10 min) rapidly disseminate knowledge without saturation. Auto-advancing formats (Pecha Kucha 20x20s, Ignite 20x15s) transform the presentation into a synchronized performance. The Pitch follows standardized structures (Sequoia: 10 key slides) to demonstrate the viability of a business model.

**Design philosophies**: Garr Reynolds (Presentation Zen) advocates radical simplicity inspired by Japanese aesthetics, countering the "Curse of Knowledge" through the elimination of the superfluous and the valorization of empty space (Ma). Nancy Duarte (Slidology) positions the audience as hero and the speaker as guide, requiring that a slide be understood in under six seconds.

**Narrative frameworks**: Duarte's Sparkline models great speeches as an oscillation between "What is" and "What could be," creating tension until the final resolution. Sinek's Golden Circle (Why→How→What) creates emotional resonance by starting with the reason for being. StoryBrand (Donald Miller) places the customer at the center according to the Hero with a Thousand Faces model. AIDA and PAS remain the pillars of persuasive copywriting.

**Cross-cultural structures**: Kishōtenketsu (Japan/China/Korea) generates interest not through conflict but through a four-part shift in perspective. Jo-ha-kyū modulates tempo through progressive acceleration. Indigenous circular narratives return to the starting point with deepened understanding. African Dilemma Tales end on an open question, turning the audience into a co-creator of meaning.

**Recommendation matrix**: For a Keynote, use the Sparkline. For a TED Talk, the Golden Circle. For a Lightning Talk, AIDA. For a Pecha Kucha, the Kishōtenketsu. For a Pitch, PAS. For a Panel, the Dilemma Tale. For an Ignite, the Jo-ha-kyū. This format-framework fit is the key to lasting influence in a message-saturated world.

## GrapheDeConnaissance

- Nancy Duarte —a_créé→ Sparkline (METHODOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Nancy Duarte —a_créé→ Slidology (METHODOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Garr Reynolds —a_créé→ Presentation Zen (METHODOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Simon Sinek —a_créé→ Golden Circle (METHODOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Sparkline —s_applique_à→ Keynote (CONCEPT, 0.93)
- Golden Circle —s_applique_à→ TED Talk (CONCEPT, 0.93)
- Kishōtenketsu —s_applique_à→ Pecha Kucha (CONCEPT, 0.9)
- AIDA —s_applique_à→ Lightning Talk (CONCEPT, 0.9)
- PAS —s_applique_à→ Pitch (CONCEPT, 0.9)
- Presentation Zen —s_inspire_de→ esthétique japonaise (Ma) (CONCEPT, 0.88)
- Kishōtenketsu —permet→ intérêt narratif sans conflit (CONCEPT, 0.88)
- formats conférence —est_basé_sur→ durée, contrainte, contrat psychologique (CONCEPT, 0.9)

---
Canonical: https://www.thekb.eu/en/fiches/guide-comparatif-formats-conference-narrations-deep-research-2026-02/