# mollick-entreprises-blocage-ia-adoption-2026-03-05

## Veille

AI adoption blocked by IT/legal in enterprises, gap between innovative and cautious companies, leadership and risk management - LinkedIn

## Titre Article

It is amazing how many companies I talk to STILL have AI effectively blocked by IT & legal departments...

## Date

2026-03-05

## URL

https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7435135940291076096/

## Keywords

AI adoption, enterprise blocking, IT, legal, risk management, leadership, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Claude Code, regulated industries, approval committee, digital transformation

## Authors

Ethan Mollick

## Ton

Profile: expert-observer perspective, conversational-professional register, accessible level. Ethan Mollick writes with a tone of measured surprise and disbelief at the inertia of certain companies. He draws on his direct field experience (consulting with companies) to illustrate a striking contrast between two types of organizations. The style is direct, factual, with a touch of irony (the parenthetical "they do not" that debunks an unfounded fear). The author's additional comment adopts a more measured analytical tone, identifying the root cause as a matter of leadership and willingness to take on risk. Target audience: business executives, IT and legal leaders, professionals interested in AI transformation.

## Pense-betes

- Many companies still have AI blocked by IT and legal departments for outdated reasons
- Companies in highly regulated industries have nonetheless found ways to deploy ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini in enterprise versions, including CLIs like Claude Code
- Striking gap: within the same industry, one company has used AI for 18 months while another has a committee that must approve every individual use case
- Some companies still fear that current models automatically train on their data (which is false)
- The decisive factor is generally the willingness of an executive (often the CEO) to take on risk and responsibility
- If the executive refuses to take on risk, the risk-reduction forces (IT, legal) have every incentive to block anything that could pose a problem
- This is fundamentally a leadership issue, not a technical one

## RésuméDe400mots

Ethan Mollick, associate professor at the Wharton School and author of Co-Intelligence, shares his astonishment at how many companies still have AI effectively blocked by their IT and legal departments, and for outdated reasons. He highlights the paradox: companies operating in highly regulated industries have already found ways to deploy enterprise AI solutions like ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, including command-line tools like Claude Code, without encountering any apparent issue.

Mollick describes what he calls one of the strangest gaps he observes: two companies in exactly the same industry can have radically different approaches. One has been using AI productively for 18 months, while the other has set up a committee that must approve every individual use case and still worries that current AI models automatically train on company data - a fear Mollick directly refutes by pointing out that this is not the case with enterprise versions.

In a follow-up comment, Mollick deepens his analysis by identifying the root cause of this divergence. The decisive factor is generally the willingness of an executive - often the CEO, but not always - to take on the risk and responsibility associated with AI adoption. When the answer is no, the risk-reduction forces within the organization (IT and legal departments foremost) have every incentive to avoid anything that could even be suspected of causing a problem.

His conclusion is clear: this is fundamentally a leadership issue. It is not a technical, regulatory, or data security problem - it is a matter of managerial courage and strategic willingness to embrace change. Companies that move forward are those whose leaders accept calculated risks, while those that stagnate are paralyzed by an institutional risk aversion that translates into bureaucratic approval processes and unfounded fears.

This post generated massive engagement (over 1,793 reactions, 288 comments, 149 shares), reflecting how strongly this observation resonated with the professional community.

## GrapheDeConnaissance

- Ethan Mollick —affirme_que→ les departements IT/juridique bloquent encore l'IA dans de nombreuses entreprises (AFFIRMATION, 0.98)
- Ethan Mollick —travaille_chez→ Wharton School (ORGANISATION, 0.99)
- Ethan Mollick —a_créé→ Co-Intelligence (DOCUMENT, 0.99)
- Entreprises regulees —utilise→ ChatGPT (TECHNOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Entreprises regulees —utilise→ Claude (TECHNOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Entreprises regulees —utilise→ Gemini (TECHNOLOGIE, 0.95)
- Leadership dirigeant —permet→ adoption IA en entreprise (CONCEPT, 0.92)
- Aversion au risque —réduit→ Adoption IA en entreprise (CONCEPT, 0.9)
- Departements IT/juridique —utilise→ reduction du risque (METHODOLOGIE, 0.88)
- Ethan Mollick —affirme_que→ les modeles IA entreprise ne s'entrainent pas sur les donnees clients (AFFIRMATION, 0.97)
- Claude Code —fait_partie_de→ outils IA deployes en entreprise (CONCEPT, 0.9)

---
Canonical: https://www.thekb.eu/en/fiches/mollick-entreprises-blocage-ia-adoption-2026-03-05/