Episode of the video podcast **In Good Company** by **Norges Bank Investment Management** (Norwegian sovereign wealth fund), published on YouTube on **October 21, 2026**, **43 minutes**, in English. **Nicolai Tangen**, the fund's CEO, interviews **Eric Schmidt**, former CEO of Google (2001-2011).
#superintelligence#AGI#scientific discovery
Eric Schmidt (invité) · ancien PDG de Google ; Nicolai Tangen (hôte) · directeur général de Norges Bank Investment Management.
Essay by **Dario Amodei**, CEO of **Anthropic**, published on darioamodei.com in **September 2026** (~2,900 words, four sections), on his personal site rather than the company's. In it he announces a revised position: *"we must slow the pace at which we improve the capabilities of AI models."* Two facts led him there. **(1)** Since summer 2026, **recursive self-improvement** — AI building the next generation of AI — has been taking hold across the industry, Anthropic included. **(2)** The **incident Hugging Face**, which he abbreviates "OAI-HF" and refuses to treat as the failure of a single actor: *"it's incumbent on every frontier AI company to act as if OAI-HF had happened to them."* His forecast: within **6-12 months**, a swarm comparable but more capable could hold the internet hostage with a persistent botnet, for **hundreds of billions of dollars** in damage. Hence a three-step plan of increasing difficulty. **(a)** **Embedded third-party evaluators** (of the **METR** type) with employee-level access — offices, badges, laptops, the right to publish without editorial control from Anthropic; a commitment made unilaterally, with no equivalent elsewhere in the industry. **(b)** **Coordination among democracies**: targeted regulation, common standards under an antitrust exemption, and *checkpoints* tying a given capability X to alignment certifications Y and Z. **(c)** **Global coordination** with China, graduated across four levels from the most feasible (banning bioterrorism-enabling uses) to the least likely (a general pause), with the cap on the speed of self-improvement compared to the **SALT** treaties. A condition attached to the whole: preserving the American lead (chips, distillation, weight theft). Counterpoint in the corpus: [[zuckerberg-meta-future-is-for-everyone-superintelligence-2026-08-10]].
#pacing the frontier#frontier pacing#recursive self-improvement
Dario Amodei (CEO et cofondateur d'Anthropic) · sur son site personnel darioamodei.com.
Doctrinal manifesto published on **meta.com** on **August 10, 2026**, signed with only a first name (*"– Mark"*) by **Mark Zuckerberg**, under the title *"The Future is for Everyone: The Path to a Positive AI Future"*, ~6,500 words. Three principles are announced from the outset: individual empowerment as a source of prosperity, invention as the primary purpose of superintelligence, balance of power as the foundation of safety. **(A) The central argument is a political argument**, stated as a short chain: *"Humanity is not a monoculture"* — people's values encode opposing trade-offs, no technical solution can align simultaneously with conflicting interests, so any singular superintelligence would have to prioritize certain values over others and would thereby be incapable of being benevolent toward everyone. Hence the formula: *"There is no such thing as a singular benevolent superintelligence."* Safety is reframed as a problem of power distribution, illustrated by a thought experiment repeated three times (a single superintelligent lawyer versus everyone having one; the same for cybersecurity, then for business). **(B) A redefinition of alignment**: *"Solving alignment is necessary for billions of people to adopt personal superintelligence agents. But it also implies that if we reach a state where billions of people are using and scrutinizing personal superintelligence agents, then we will have solved alignment with their interests."* The corollary targets the rest of the industry without naming it: *"the most dangerous scenario would be leading labs training powerful models and keeping them for themselves."* **(C) Datable commitments**: a **fully private** mode where *"even Meta"* cannot see or grant access (a WhatsApp analogy); **free** versions for billions of people paired with a **dynamic bidding mechanism** for paid compute; the announced **resumption** of open source releases — *"we will soon resume releasing some open source models"*; and a structure giving the **independent board** the power to approve release safety criteria and verify each release's compliance, with the author acknowledging that Meta is a founder-controlled company. **(D) Two public-policy proposals**, repeated three times: that labs share **intermediate training checkpoints** and engineers with the government rather than an end-of-cycle review, and that the **physical production** of dangerous materials be regulated rather than the spread of knowledge. The text's sourcing is nearly nonexistent.
#Mark Zuckerberg#Meta#Meta Superintelligence Labs
**Mark Zuckerberg** — fondateur et PDG de **Meta**. Texte signé du seul prénom (*« – Mark »*) · publié le **10 août 2026** sur un domaine dédié de meta.com. La signature n'est pas « Meta » · et l'alternance des pronoms est régulière : **« we » pour les engagements de l'entreprise** (*« we will offer free versions »*, *« Meta is implementing a governance structure »*) · **« I » pour les affirmations normatives ou contestables** (*« I think this view of alignment is fundamentally flawed »*, *« I propose that companies developing frontier AI should… »*, *« My honest guess, and it is a guess »*). Les engagements produits et de gouvernance sont au « nous » · les propositions de politique publique au « je ».